|
Florida Property Tax
Reductions Passed!
In a rush to
show that lawmakers are
serious about cutting
property taxes, a House
council passed a
controversial bill Wednesday
to sharply roll back local
taxes, which would save
property owners statewide as
much as $5.8 billion. The House Efficiency and
Accountability Council
ignored repeated calls from
Democrats to slow down the
debate and voted 10-5 along
party lines for a measure to
force counties to roll back
local taxes to where they
were in fiscal year 2000-01,
plus an additional amount to
account for population
growth and inflation. As Florida’s counties
warned of “Draconian
choices” they would have to
make and Democrats
complained of being
railroaded, the discord put
a quick end to the
bipartisan harmony that
House leaders said would
mark the 60-day session that
began Tuesday. None of that mattered to
House Republicans, who have
adopted House Speaker Marco
Rubio’s urging to “be a
little impatient” about
moving ahead on a plan,
which has just one more
committee stop before the
full House votes on it. The tax rollback would be
the first step in a
two-phase approach House
leaders are touting; the
second is a constitutional
amendment to do away with
all taxes on homesteaded
property and replace them
with a 2 1⁄2-cent hike in
the statewide sales tax. The proposed rollback
would save taxpayers in
Miami-Dade an estimated 35
percent on their county
taxes. The hit to the
county: between $613 million
and $725 million. The
savings to taxpayers in
Broward: 22 percent. The hit
to Broward coffers: at least
$198 million. “Counties must decide
with this bill whether we’re
going to fund libraries, the
softball player at the
recreational park, the child
in the burning attic, the
grandfather who has a heart
attack, or the woman who has
a burglar at her door,”
Sarah Bleakley, a lobbyist
for the Florida Association
of Counties, told lawmakers.
“Which one of those programs
do you all think are
frills?” In Miami-Dade, county
officials say $5.2 billion
of their $7 billion budget
is spending required by
state and federal law,
airport or port services
contracts, or is being used
to pay back debt. An
additional $1.3 billion goes
to county medical examiners,
police patrols, jails and
juvenile justice, the county
health trust and elections
offices. “That leaves $500 million
of expenses that someone
says you don’t have to do,”
said Jennifer Glazer-Moon,
the county budget director.
“But that includes the
administration of the
county, the parks
department, human services
department and cultural
programs.” Broward County
Commissioner Ilene Lieberman
told the House committee
that county officials agree
Florida’s “archaic” tax
structure needs an overhaul,
“but we disagree this is the
right fix.” “You want to be careful
as you’re pushing on one
side you’re not creating a
bigger bulge on the other
side,” she said. She warned
that Broward and other
counties could be forced to
start charging user fees
for, say, borrowing books at
the library. Rep. Julio Robaina, a
Miami Republican, said he
felt no sympathy for county
governments, blasting
Miami-Dade County for
squandering millions over
the years. He predicted the
rollback will “make the
county commissioners more
than ever vigilant over
every dollar.” Council Chairman Rep.
Andy Gardiner of Orlando
noted that the proposal
allows counties to get
around the rollback by a
two-thirds vote of the
county commission. “So if there are concerns
about ‘Draconian cuts’ or
cutting police departments
or softball players, can’t
they go out, discuss that in
a community and by a
two-thirds vote override
essentially what we’re
asking them to do?” he said. Who benefits Owners of homesteaded
property would see the
smallest decline in their
property taxes – $433
million across the state.
Owners of second homes and
other residential real
estate, who have shouldered
a larger share of the tax
burden in recent years,
would reap $767 million in
savings, while business
properties would see the
greatest savings – $3.35
billion. But Democrats complained
that the fast pace of the
bill’s progress, coupled by
the short notice they were
given to prepare for the
vote, has forced lawmakers
to vote on a measure even
though they have no clear
idea how their local
governments will handle it. By contrast, the Senate
is taking its time on
property taxes. As of
Wednesday, senators had not
yet come up with their own
plan. Criticism Rep. Dan Gelber, the
House Democratic leader from
Miami Beach, noted that his
city would be among the
hardest hit in the state – a
51 percent cut in its tax
rolls and budget. Because
the city has paid for its
growth, rather than resorted
to issuing bonds, the House
scheme blindly penalizes the
city for being responsible,
he said. “We are about to make the
biggest decision we’ve ever
made in the dark,” he said.
“One thing we will not do is
cede this incredibly
important issue to rank
politics.” The discord on the
session’s second day wasn’t
the first sign that party
differences would dominate
the debate. The Florida GOP has
launched a website touting
the House’s tax plan and
promoting the constitutional
amendment. Rubio and his top
deputies have sent out
e-mails urging Republicans
across the state to click on
www.nomoreproperty tax.com. Among the information on
the site, it calls the
governor’s proposed solution
– doubling the homestead
exemption – a “band-aid”
approach to the problem. Republican Party
spokesman Jeff Sadosky
defended the website, even
though Senate Republicans
have not endorsed the House
proposal. “What the party is
endorsing is getting the
issue out there,” he said. |


